ABSTRACT
Background: With the murder of George Floyd and health disparities laid bare by the COVID pandemic, the US is reckoning with racial injustice. Across medicine and oncology, institutions are grappling with how to address systemic racism and improve care for patients of color. At the University of North Carolina (UNC), trainees developed an educational curriculum to raise awareness of implicit bias and introduce methods to address racial inequities. We present our findings on feasibility and acceptability of a fellow-led course on racism in medicine at a major academic medical center. Methods: UNC oncology fellows adapted a curriculum on implicit bias and racism in medicine in spring 2021. Our aims were 1) to improve knowledge and awareness about implicit bias and systemic racism and 2) introduce methods to address racial inequities. We used lived experiences and collated materials from scientific literature and lay media to illustrate key points. Sessions were: 1) Introduction and Implicit Bias, 2) Implicit Bias in Action: A Case Study, 3) Race-Based Metrics: Journal Club, 4) Career Perspective on Equity in Oncology. Videos, journal articles, and group discussion were employed to appeal to many learning styles. Results: Four sessions were held virtually for the Divisions of Oncology and Hematology. Attendance ranged from 28 to 35 per session. A post curriculum survey assessed perception of racial inequality in medicine and the series' effects using a Likert scale. Twenty-nine participants completed the survey, 12 of whom were fellows. Of all participants, 71% reported that the course improved knowledge or awareness of racial inequities “some” or “a great deal” and 61% reported that it improved their comfort level addressing racial inequities “some” or “a great deal.” All participants endorsed at least “some” racial inequity in medicine. Notably, over 75% of participants indicated interest in further sessions. Conclusions: Formulation of an educational curriculum by fellows and delivered in a division wide setting was feasible and well received by participants with robust discussion and interest in further work. Fundamental to this series' effectiveness was creating a space for discussion and reflection among colleagues. The goals of improving knowledge and introducing methods to address racial inequities were met. Importantly, our course was integrated alongside institutional efforts on DEI. We were limited by a lack of pre-course survey results due to a technical error. Given the current groundswell of interest and focus in improving racial equity in our society, we encourage other institutions to take similar steps to highlight issues of systemic racism and continue to move our field in the right direction.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The SARS-CoV2 pandemic impacted numerous aspects of medical practice, including continuingmedical education. In-person and single-institution educational formats could not address the challenges of socialdistancing, heterogeneous regional experiences, and continuously emerging data. The vulnerability of cancerpatients to SARS-CoV2 added further urgency to overcoming these barriers. To fulfill these unmet educational andpatient care needs, we established a novel cross-institutional trainee-driven, on-line collaborative for the purpose ofgenerating multidisciplinary seminars on emerging best practices for the acute management of patients with SARS-CoV2. Methods: The COVID Learning Initiative is currently managed by clinical trainees and faculty from 13 institutionsacross 10 states. Weekly Zoom conferences were led by a rotating team consisting of 2-3 fellows overseen by 4-5expert faculty from throughout the country. Format consisted of two 15-minute instructional segments presented bytrainees, followed by a concluding 30-minute faculty Q&A panel moderated by a trainee. Attendees completedbaseline demographics, SARS-CoV2 experience surveys, and pre/post conference knowledge questions.Conferences were recorded and archived to enhance access and dissemination of knowledge. Results: Within 6 weeks and beginning just 2 weeks after inception we produced five 1-hour-longmultidisciplinary video conferences covering emerging antiviral therapies, coagulopathy, pulmonary complications, provider resilience, and ethics of resource scarcity. On average, there were 100 participants per seminar. Post-conference questioning consistently demonstrated acquisition of knowledge across topics and disciplines. Attendeesalso improved in their self-assessed comfort managing multidisciplinary aspects of SARS-CoV2. Overall, presentingcollaborations involved 11 fellows and 28 faculty representing 6 medical specialties and 17 institutions. Severalcollaborations persisted, resulting in further dissemination of knowledge with tangible outcomes such as generationof peer-reviewed manuscripts. Conclusions: The COVID Learning Initiative demonstrated a novel continuing medical education platform capableof rapidly disseminating knowledge at a national scale, while realizing new opportunities for remote traineementoring and skills development. With initial feasibility and continued interest among participating institutions, COVID Learning Initiative plans to evolve to Fellows ACHIEVE: Alliance for Collaborative Hematology OncologyInter-Institutional Education through Videoconferencing to conduct an extended multi-institutional educational serieson adapting cancer management and training program best practices.